The goal of this section is to introduce the notion of classifying space
of a (Hausdorff) topological group
. This space has the property that isomorphism classes of principal
-bundles over a paracompact Hausdorff base space correspond bijectively to homotopy classes of maps from the base to
, hence the name. More explicitly this correspondence is given by pullback of a universal principal
-bundle
.
The whole world in an example[edit | edit source]
We begin by considering the special case of
. But first we need some preliminaries on Grassmannians. Denote by
the Grassmannian of
-dimensional linear subspaces of
. We then have a tautological short exact sequence of vector bundles on
:

Here

denotes the tautological subspace bundle on

,

is the trivial bundle with fibre

over

and

is the obvious quotient bundle. If we define

and

we obtain a vector bundle

which we can think of as the tautological quotient bundle on the infinite quotient Grassmannian

.
Now let
be a complex vector bundle of rank
over a manifold
; for the present discussion it is irrelevant whether this is a smooth vector bundle or just a topological one. Denote by
the trivial vector bundle with fibre
over
, where
is the space of sections of
. We then have a short exact sequence of vector bundles

where the map

is the obvious one given by evaluation of sections. Thinking of

as the vector space

, this expresses

as a quotient of

, i.e. every fibre of

is a

-dimensional quotient of

. This corresponds to having a map (continuous or smooth, depending on the chosen setting)

such that

is the pullback

of the tautological quotient bundle

under

. When

is the tangent bundle of

we can think of this map

as a generalised Gauss map for the manifold. Denote by

the set of isomorphism classes of complex vector bundles of rank

over

and let
![{\displaystyle [M,Gr(\mathbb {C} ^{\infty },r)]}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/540c86782494b4415e7b2a557291bc09d5510efb)
be the set of homotopy classes of maps

. Since pullbacks under homotopic maps are isomorphic we have sketched the proof of a bijective correspondende
![{\displaystyle \operatorname {Vect} _{\mathbb {C} }^{r}(M)\longleftrightarrow [M,Gr(\mathbb {C} ^{\infty },r)].}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/81735c308979d3b8184e67ff89271d8de33cddcd)
For the present case of

we write

.
Example 5.1
Consider the case
. By choosing inner products on the
(e.g. the obvious ones) we obtain an isomorphism
. Combining this with what we have seen so far we obtain a bijective correspondence
![{\displaystyle \operatorname {Vect} _{\mathbb {C} }^{1}(M)\longleftrightarrow [M,\mathbb {C} P^{\infty }].}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/0f0336368a39033002cf3a4ca18f76cb52c474bf)
Example 5.2
Now let
be the unit
-sphere. One can show by means of clutching functions that
corresponds bijectively to
. But by what we have seen now we also know that
corresponds to
. Thus we conclude that there is an isomorphism

for every

(actually we only know that it is a bijection, we will however see shortly that it is indeed an isomorphism). Note that we are explicitly working with

and

here, but the same argument does work for general classifying spaces once we have defined them.
Note that The whole world in an example doesn't quite fit into the general statement given in the introduction: there are no principal bundles mentioned here. It turns out however that there is a somewhat canonical correspondence between complex vector bundles of rank
and principal
-bundles (this works for other fields too). Namely we define the frame bundle of a given vector bundle
of rank
to be the principal
-bundle
whose fibre over a point is the space of isomorphisms from
to the fibre of
over that point. Note that there is an obvious right action of
on
which preserves the fibres and acts freely and transitively on them. Noting that pulling back commutes with the frame bundle construction we can translate what we have seen so far into a correspondence
![{\displaystyle \{{\text{principal }}GL(r,\mathbb {C} ){\text{-bundles over }}M\}/{\text{isomorphism}}\longleftrightarrow [M,Gr(\mathbb {C} ^{\infty },r)].}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/6f1a3d12c2fb5d74a6d681c974b65ed4aa5c1742)
The correspondence here is given by pulling back the frame bundle of

. We will denote it by

and say that it is the
universal principal
-bundle (precisely because of the above correspondence).
We now want to see that the space
is weakly contractible. This will be true in the general setting and is part of the allure of the universal principal bundle. Knowing that
is paracompact we obtain a long exact sequence of homotopy groups:

All the maps except

are the obvious ones. To construct

start by picking an element
![{\displaystyle [a]\in \pi _{i}(BG)}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/0f1c4ee5dd8f8c297a09793a8b4e1ed253dd6e71)
and choosing a representative

. We can think of this map as a map

on the closed unit

-disk that is constant on its boundary

. From the fact that

is a fibre bundle with paracompact base space we know that there is a lift

of

. Since the image of

under

is a single point we know that its image under

must be contained in a fibre. Thus we have

and we can define
![{\displaystyle \partial _{*}([a]):=q[{\tilde {a}}|_{S^{n-1}}]\in \pi _{n-1}(G).}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/252f5945e95017b269839e0280dec689aeb04403)
The fact that this is well-defined follows from the homotopy lifting property for fibre bundles over a paracompact base. If we now knew that

is an isomorphism we'd be done. This is indeed true as the following exercise shows:
Exercise 5.1
Meditate on the fact that
is the same map as the one in (MISSING).
Exercise 5.2
Think about what the above construction of
looks like explicitly in the case of the Hopf fibration
.
Exercise 5.3
Let
be the group of integers under addition. Show that
and that
is
with the map being the complex exponential. Do the above by noting that principal
-bundles on
are in correspondence with
and that the latter is in correspondence with
.
Exercise 5.4
Think about what the total space of the pullback of
under the double cover
looks like.
To define the classifying space and universal bundle for a general (Hausdorff) group we can start by constructing a principal
-bundle
with
contractible. To do this we use the topological join construction:
Definition 5.1
Let
be topological spaces. The join
is then defined to be
, where the equivalence relation
is generated by
and
for
and
.
Note that the join of two spaces is just the space obtained by connecting every point of one space by the unit interval to every point of the other space. Moreover the construction is associative and commutative. We now define the universal bundle by setting
and
. One has to verify that this is indeed a principal
-bundle (in particular that it has local trivialisations), but that follows by thinking in an appropriately elegant way about
.
Example 5.3
We have seen how to construct
. If
has a faithful linear representation
then note that
acts freely on
and so we can just define
and
.
We now have the following correspondence in general:
Theorem 5.1
Let
be a paracompact Hausdorff space and let
be a Hausdorff topological group. There is a bijective correspondence
![{\displaystyle \{{\text{principal }}G{\text{-bundles on M}}\}/{\text{isomorphism}}\longleftrightarrow [M,BG],}](//restbase.wikitolearn.org/en.wikitolearn.org/v1/media/math/render/svg/6e5d5bcadb6a7e1669f8e86c60a70747b9eb0ff8)
where the map from right to left is given by pulling back

along a representative.
For Example 5.3 to fit into this general picture we have to mention another result:
Theorem 5.2
Let
be a Hausdorff topological group. Then every principal
-bundle with contractible total space is a universal bundle in the sense of Theorem 5.1. In particular its total and base spaces are unique up to homotopy.
Although a rigorous proof of Theorem 5.1 in the general topological setting requires some care regarding technicalities, we can easily argue why this should be true for the case of
a smooth manifold and
a compact Lie group. Namely let
be a principal
-bundle and consider the following diagram:
Here
where
for
,
and
. Now note that the bundle
is the pullback of
under the obvious map
, and also that it is the pullback of
under the projection
. But we also have that
is a fibre bundle with fibre
which is weakly contractible and so it has a global section
. Finally it follows from what we have said so far that
is the pullback of
under
.